The Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A Google Notebook Video and Audio Podcast



 

In this Google Notebook, we reexamine Judas.  I'm not making apologies or claiming innocence... that's not the point.  It's perspective that drove me to write this book and it was the fact that I am certain that Jesus loved and loves Judas... and that Judas had to love Jesus... there simply is no explanation for betraying someone you know is literally blessed by God.  It's one thing to have "blind" faith... it's a totally different thing to see those events first hand... to experience the truth, no matter how blurry we see it now.  Our faith is based on history... and echoes from the path.  Judas stood there... he watched it all... and then he betrayed.  You never wondered why?

https://qmichaellewis.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-gospel-according-to-st-judas.html


That was a free copy of the book... it's onsale on Smashwords as a book but the entire contents are right there.... click the link and read all you like.

I am using Google's Notebook to help explain it... there's a lot to unpack so the audio podcast was amazing.  There's also other documents in there and you can continue the conversation... read any part of it with AI and find out if I'm just making things up for the fun of it... LOL.

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/df1a6649-23bd-4d54-8439-8006f5f00f53?artifactId=6910d125-1852-462f-8ebe-c7362b3a749e

Enjoy and I hope you read it in the spirit it was intended.  I didn't come to praise Judas... but to bury him.  Not as a Devil, not as evil... but as a man, fragile and expecting the wrong thing and unintentionally splitting time in half in the process.



Popular posts from this blog

Casimir-Coupled Tachyonic Venting (CCTV): Hawking Radiation as Stroboscopic Phase Instability with Noether-Complete Energy Ledger

Image
Faster-Than-Light as Frame, Not Cheat — Why the Channel Saves Causality, Information, and Entropy Faster-Than-Light as Frame, Not Cheat — Why the Channel Saves Causality, Information, and Entropy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oui9sGtn5wg The claim is simple: faster-than-light can be real as a frame-of-reference fact inside a quantum channel without violating causality. In that same picture, information is not lost in black holes, and the second law remains intact. The only trick is to stop treating “speed” as a sacred scalar and start acknowledging the lane you’re measuring in. Switch the lane—switch the operational frame—and the mystery becomes arithmetic. 1) Channel-Relative Speed Is the Point Ordinary light plods along in the background medium defined by the exterior geometry. A pumped quantum channel near a horizon defines a different medium. Inside that channel, the bright structure can overtake ambient light and appear...
Read more

The Prime-Polygon Lune: Grounding the Riemann Line with a Geodesic–Chiral Geometry

Image
  The Prime-Polygon Lune: Grounding the Riemann Line with a Geodesic–Chiral Geometry YouTube Video 1 YouTube Podcast 1 A direct geometric route to the zeta spectrum, twin-prime infinitude, and an RSA entropy shortfall -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract This paper presents a complete geometric framework that grounds the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) and, as a direct consequence, establishes the infinitude of twin primes and quantifies a structural vulnerability in RSA encryption. Our central object is the "Prime-Polygon Lune," an elementary construction derived from the Euclidean phasor walk H_m(t) = Σ e^(ipt) . We prove three foundational geometric identities: an exact formula for the polygon's area (Q1), a decomposition into a master triangle, inner strip, and residual lune (Q2), and a universal bound on the lune's size (Q3). The core thesis is that standard analysis fails because it measures the prime signal on a fla...
Read more

Building a Computer from Dirt and Rocks: A Journey from First Principles & Binary Energy Dynamics: Resolving the Information Loss Paradox in Black Holes

Image
  Google's AI Podcast When people talk about computers, they sound like priests reciting a code no one else can read. Everything is hidden under layers—kernels, stacks, caches, quantum foam if you let them talk long enough. It’s impressive, sure, but it builds the wrong mythology. The machine isn’t that mysterious. It’s just the modern mask of a very old impulse: to trap thought in matter. A computer is a physical argument. Someone once said, “if I push this and not that, I can make a pattern appear.” That’s all this has ever been. A chain of “if” and “then” baked into stone, then copper, then silicon. The words have gotten fancier, the voltages smaller, the loops tighter. But the logic hasn’t aged a day. The strange thing about learning computing now is that it’s usually taught upside down. You start with syntax before you ever learn what a state is. You’re handed a glowing screen and told to “write a loop,” as if you already know what repetition feels like to a machine. The fie...
Read more