The Conservation of Heart

 



In every heartbeat, a timeless principle is revealed: energy is neither created nor destroyed—it is transformed, conserved, and returned. This idea, which we might call The Conservation of Heart, invites us to explore the poetry of life through numbers, and to imagine, even if only in thought, a system that echoes the heart’s rhythm.

The Heart’s Pulse in Numbers

Each beat of the human heart is a carefully orchestrated event, where stored chemical energy is transformed into mechanical work. Let’s examine the math that underlies this vital process.

Stroke Volume and Pressure

  • Stroke Volume (Vₛ):
    The average human heart ejects about 70 mL of blood per beat. Converting to cubic meters:

    Vs=70 mL=70×10−6 m3Vₛ = 70\,\text{mL} = 70 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{m}^3

  • Effective Pressure (P):
    Though the heart experiences a range of pressures, a common approximation for the effective pressure during ejection is around 93 mmHg. Converting to Pascals:

    93 mmHg×133.3 PammHg≈12 400 Pa93\,\text{mmHg} \times 133.3\,\frac{\text{Pa}}{\text{mmHg}} \approx 12\,400\,\text{Pa}

Work Done per Beat

The mechanical work done by the heart per beat can be approximated by the product of the effective pressure and the stroke volume:

W=P×VsW = P \times Vₛ

Substituting the values:

W=12 400 Pa×70×10−6 m3≈0.868 JW = 12\,400\,\text{Pa} \times 70 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{m}^3 \approx 0.868\,\text{J}

Thus, each heartbeat delivers roughly 0.87 joules of energy—a continuous renewal of life’s driving force.

A Thoughtful Parallel

Imagine for a moment that this elegant process could inspire an engineered system—a system that, like the heart, stores energy, releases it in a burst, and then recovers what remains to fuel the next pulse. While no specific device is being presented here, the analogy is compelling.

In such a conceptual system, energy might be stored in a reservoir, much like the chemical energy in our heart’s cells. When the time comes to release a pulse, this stored energy would be discharged rapidly, performing work analogous to the mechanical contraction of the heart. And, inspired by the heart’s efficiency, the system would incorporate a mechanism to recapture a portion of the energy, ensuring that the cycle continues in a sustainable, rhythmic dance.

The Universality of Conservation

The beauty of this analogy lies in its simplicity: the same physical law—the conservation of energy—governs both the human heart and any system we might imagine that mimics its behavior. In the heart, energy is stored, converted, and delivered with remarkable efficiency. In our speculative system, even if the details differ, the underlying math remains unchanged. Energy, whether in the form of a pulsating beat or an electrical spark, obeys the universal principle that its total amount remains constant, merely changing form.

A Poetic Reflection

The Conservation of Heart is more than a scientific principle—it is a tribute to the elegant symmetry that bridges biology and technology. The work done by each heartbeat, calculated to be about 0.87 J, is a testament to nature’s mastery over energy. And while we only dare to dream of a circuit that might one day mirror this process, the thought itself is a celebration of the unifying language of the universe.

In both life and our imaginative constructs, energy is the pulse that sustains all processes—a pulse that, in its conservation, reveals the profound interconnectedness of everything.


Popular posts from this blog

The Lewis Ratchet: Forward Asymmetric Momentum Transfer

Image
  The Lewis Ratchet: Forward Asymmetric Momentum Transfer I figured out how to make a model of this:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5x0Yd7kjSc Imagine you’re floating on a small raft in a calm lake—a bit like Huck Finn’s raft, but with a twist. Instead of a motor or engine, your raft relies on an ingenious idea: by moving an internal mass back and forth in an asymmetric way, you can slowly “scooch” the raft forward. This is the essence of the Lewis Ratchet. The Basic Idea In an ideal, frictionless world, any internal motion—like shaking a heavy bar or throwing a medicine ball—cancels out. When you push one way, you push the other equally. But if you can arrange for the forward push to be strong and quick, and the return motion to be gentle and slow, the momentum transferred during the fast “kick” isn’t completely undone by the slow “reset.” In a real-world setting, friction (or water drag) then “locks in” that net gain, causing the raft to move forward incrementally with ea...
Read more

Modeling the Bond Market as a First Order Lag

Image
Dynamics of U.S. Treasury Yields as a First-Order Lag System under Macroeconomic Shocks Introduction U.S. Treasury bonds across the maturity spectrum (from short-term bills to long-term bonds) exhibit distinct dynamic responses to macroeconomic events. When a clearly timestamped event occurs – such as a tariff announcement, a fiscal policy change, a central bank interest rate decision, or a major geopolitical action – bond yields typically move as the market processes the new information ( Yield curve - Wikipedia ). Rather than changing instantaneously to a new equilibrium, yields often adjust with a lag : an initial jump or dip is followed by a gradual approach toward a new level or a reversion back to the prior trend. This behavior suggests that the bond market might be viewed through the lens of control theory , treating yields as the output of a system responding over time to an input shock. In particular, an intriguing question is whether Treasury yields can be modeled as firs...
Read more

Modeling the Tariff Pass‑Through as a First‑Order Lag

Image
When a tariff is imposed, its full effect is not felt immediately. Instead, prices adjust gradually as inventories turn over, contracts are renegotiated, and consumers become aware of the new cost. One common way to model this gradual adjustment is to use an exponential lag model. For a good with an initial price P 0 P_0 and a tariff that ultimately raises the price by Δ P \Delta P (expressed in absolute terms or as a percentage), we can write the time‑dependent price as: P ( t ) = P 0 + Δ P   ( 1 − e − λ t ) , P(t) = P_0 + \Delta P\,\Bigl(1 - e^{-\lambda t}\Bigr), where: P ( t ) P(t) is the price at time t t (with t t measured in months, for example), P 0 P_0 is the initial price before the tariff, Δ P \Delta P is the full price increase that the tariff would induce (e.g. if a 10% tariff on a $100 product, then Δ P = $ 10 \Delta P = \$10 ), λ \lambda is a positive parameter (per month) that describes the speed of the adjustment (the higher λ \lambda is, the faster the...
Read more