Current Threat Assessment for the Western Hemisphere for Security Professionals

 

The goal is not to overreact or underreact.  What is happening?  What will happen as things escalates?  How will Venezuela defend itself?  Clearly it's only options are a Ukrainian style defense but since the U.S. will just bomb the hell out of them nationwide, it won't be the same sort of theater of war.  Yes, it will be a slaughter at first.  Venezuela will crumble instantly... and then the war begins.  

1. Strategic Context: Where We Actually Are

1.1 US posture

Since late summer 2025, the US has executed the largest military buildup in the Caribbean in decades under Operation Southern Spear:

• Nearly a dozen US warships including the carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, amphibious ships, and guided-missile destroyers are operating north of Venezuela, with roughly 12,000–15,000 sailors and Marines in theater. (AP News)

• US forces have already conducted at least 21–22 lethal strikes on suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing 80–90+ people, framed as strikes against “narcoterrorists” affiliated with FTO-designated groups such as Tren de Aragua. (Reuters)

• US airspace authorities and commercial aviation have responded with rapid rerouting around Venezuelan airspace after FAA warnings and a unilateral US declaration that that airspace is “closed” to US traffic. (Reuters)

This is no longer a hypothetical contingency plan. It is a live operation that already involves sustained kinetic activity.

1.2 Venezuelan posture

Venezuela has responded by:

• Mobilizing its armed forces, staging exercises, and moving naval and air assets (including Iranian-supplied fast boats and drones) to reinforce coastal defense and the Essequibo/Guyana front. (Army Recognition)

• Deepening coordination with Iran, Russia, and China:

  • Iran has played a key role in building Venezuela’s armed drone program (ANSU-100/200, Mohajer-derived airframes) and loitering munitions modeled on Shahed-136, and reportedly retains heavy control over the associated facilities. (Army Recognition)

  • Leaked documents indicate Caracas has sought additional Russian missiles, radars, and aircraft as the US buildup intensified. (The Washington Post)

Venezuela does not have the capacity to win a conventional fight with a Ford-class carrier group, but it does have enough anti-access, drone, and missile capability to complicate US operations and impose costs—especially at sea and in neighboring states.

1.3 Political trajectory

Three parallel tracks are moving at once:

1. US domestic framing – The administration has legally and rhetorically reclassified several Latin American criminal organizations (e.g., Tren de Aragua, Cartel de los Soles, MS-13, major Mexican cartels) as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). (The White House)

2. Escalatory pattern – Lethal strikes at sea, sanctions, and naval buildup are becoming routine; a single strike inside Venezuelan territory would be a qualitative shift but not a logical leap from where we are now. (AP News)

3. Back-channel diplomacy – Reports that:

   • The US is in some form of communication with Maduro about exit terms. (Reuters)

   • Elements in Cuba’s regime are quietly probing a post-Maduro regional order, even while Havana publicly denounces US “aggression.” (Reuters)

For security planners, the key point is: the system is primed for escalation. Once a US munition detonates on Venezuelan soil, both regimes will be politically locked into some form of conflict, and asymmetric responses become rational options for Caracas and its allies.

---

2. Threat Ecosystem: Who Matters Once It’s a Shooting War

This section focuses strictly on actors with intent + capability + proximity to affect US security if the conflict moves from sea strikes to strikes on Venezuelan territory and possible ground deployments.

2.1 Venezuelan state security & paramilitaries

Core entities

• Armed Forces & intelligence: FANB, SEBIN, DGCIM, specialized police units (e.g., FAES).

• Paramilitary auxiliaries: Colectivos—Bolivarian, pro-government militias operating as regime enforcers.

Track record

• Extensive documentation by UN and human rights groups of:

  • Extrajudicial killings, disappearances, torture, and violent suppression of dissent.

  • Use of colectivos as deniable street-level enforcers and tools of political terror in urban barrios.

Wartime behavior expectation

If US strikes hit Venezuelan soil or major regime assets, expect:

• Maximal internal repression – mass arrests, show trials, and targeted killings of suspected opposition figures and “US collaborators.”

• Localized asymmetric tactics – armed harassment of any US presence, sabotage against diplomatic missions and NGOs, plus intimidation of foreign media.

• Regionally, colectivos themselves are not a long-range expeditionary tool, but paired with Cuban advisors they sharpen the internal security response and complicate any regime-change operation.

2.2 Colombian insurgent groups: ELN & FARC dissidents

Where they are

• ELN and FARC dissident fronts operate in and around Colombia’s Catatumbo, Arauca, and the Orinoco basin, with confirmed presence and operations inside Venezuelan territory. (hrw.org)

Current pattern

• Active attacks, kidnappings, and clashes in the border region; the 2025 Catatumbo clashes alone have displaced tens of thousands and killed scores of civilians. (Wikipedia)

Conflict role

Under a US–Venezuela war scenario:

• ELN/FARC can become force multipliers for Caracas by:

  • Targeting Colombian critical infrastructure (pipelines, roads, power) to stretch Bogotá and any US logistics relying on Colombia.

  • Providing irregular cross-border forces—ambushes, harassment of supply lines, and guerrilla operations near any land corridor.

• While they have limited direct reach into the continental US, they directly shape the regional operating environment, especially for military and energy infrastructure security.

2.3 Iran & Hezbollah footprint

Military cooperation

• Iran has been critical in building Venezuela into Latin America’s only armed-drone operator, including locally assembled Mohajer-derived systems and loitering munitions. (Army Recognition)

• Analysts highlight Venezuela as an Iranian forward operating and logistics node, including joint military exercises and possible IRGC/Quds Force presence. (War on the Rocks)

Hezbollah & networks

• Hezbollah has long operated in the Americas through:

  • Fundraising and smuggling networks (notably in the Tri-Border Area and within Venezuelan-linked expatriate communities).

  • Historical precedent for major terror attacks (e.g., the 1990s Buenos Aires bombings) tied to Iran and Hezbollah. (Global Guardian)

Conflict role

If the US conducts overt strikes on Venezuelan territory:

• Tehran will reassess its calculus for using Latin America as a distant flank in its broader confrontation with the US and Israel. (ایران اینترنشنال | Iran International)

• Plausible escalatory channels:

  • Attacks against US, Israeli, or Jewish targets in Latin America (embassies, consulates, community centers, business interests).

  • Cyber operations against US and regional infrastructure from Iranian or Lebanese networks.

  • Enhanced maritime harassment using Iranian-pattern missile boats and drones integrated into Venezuelan forces (anti-ship strikes, mining, UAV attacks on offshore platforms). (Army Recognition)

This is where a local war becomes a globalized asymmetric conflict with direct relevance to US homeland security.

2.4 Terror-designated criminal organizations

US policy has now deliberately blurred the line between cartel and terrorist organization:

• Tren de Aragua (TdA) – a Venezuelan-origin megabanda active across Latin America and now present in US cities; designated an FTO and SDGT with growing sanctions and rewards targeting leadership. (Federal Register)

• Cartel de los Soles – network of Venezuelan military and political elites implicated in large-scale cocaine trafficking; slated for FTO designation. (U.S. Department of State)

These groups are profit-driven, not ideological, but they:

• Provide manpower, logistics corridors, and deniability for state and proxy operations.

• Are embedded in migrant flows, urban crime ecosystems, and cross-border smuggling networks that already intersect with US cities and ports.

From a security standpoint, they are a vector for regime-linked or Iran-linked asymmetric options rather than independent strategic actors.

2.5 Cuba and other regional states

• Cuba has deep penetration of Venezuela’s security apparatus—advisors in intelligence, counterintelligence, and elite units—and is now actively engaged in quiet talks about a possible post-Maduro arrangement even as it publicly rails against US aggression. (Reuters)

• Guyana, Colombia, and Brazil are all being pulled into the security orbit of the crisis in different ways; Colombia in particular is managing border emergencies caused by ELN/FARC conflict spillover. (Al Jazeera)

Cuba matters primarily as an intelligence and regime-survival enabler; Colombia and Guyana matter as terrain and basing for any extended operation.

---

3. Likely Escalation Pathways Once “One Bomb Drops”

Below are realistic paths rather than extremes, each with different implications for US security professionals.

Scenario A – Limited punitive strike, no ground invasion

Trigger: Targeted US air or cruise-missile strike on a Venezuelan military asset (e.g., drone facility, coastal battery, or naval base) in response to aggression at sea or a high-casualty incident involving US forces.

Military profile

• Limited strike window (hours–days), focused on “narcoterrorist infrastructure” or specific military capabilities.

• Minimal immediate ground involvement; Marines and SOF retain contingency roles.

Asymmetric Venezuelan response

• Inside Venezuela: Heightened repression, mass mobilization of militias, anti-US propaganda.

• Regionally:

  • Use of drones and anti-ship missiles to harass US vessels or allied platforms (e.g., Guyanese offshore fields). (Army Recognition)

  • Covert support to ELN/FARC operations targeting Colombian security forces and infrastructure. (hrw.org)

Implications for US security practitioners

• Homeland threat level: Moderate but not negligible. Key concerns:

  • Cyber probes against financial, energy, and government networks attributed to Venezuelan or Iranian actors.

  • Increased operational tempo from Latin American gangs (TdA and others) in US cities, partly opportunistic, partly politically framed.

• Required posture:

  • Elevated alert on ports of entry, embassies, and petrochemical infrastructure.

  • Stronger fusion between DHS, FBI, DoD, and private critical-infrastructure security for anomaly detection.

Scenario B – Extended air campaign + persistent maritime and SOF presence

Trigger: Continued Venezuelan resistance at sea, attacks on US ships, or a major incident (e.g., a drone or missile strike causing US casualties).

Military profile

• Weeks to months of US and possibly allied air and naval strikes against:

  • Air defenses, radars, high-value naval assets.

  • Drone/missile production and storage facilities.

  • Command-and-control and intelligence nodes.

• US SOF presence in theater for targeting, SAR, and support to local partners.

Asymmetric Venezuelan / ally response

• Maritime and coastal:

  • Expanded use of Iranian-pattern drones and missiles for anti-ship strikes, swarm harassment, and ISR along regional sea lanes. (Army Recognition)

• Regional terrorism risk:

  • If Iran and Hezbollah interpret this as part of a broader US strategy against them, there is a non-trivial probability of attacks on US, Israeli, or Jewish targets in Latin America, echoing 1990s precedents but with modern methods. (ایران اینترنشنال | Iran International)

• Criminal/terror cartel activation:

  • Regime-linked networks (Tren de Aragua, Cartel de los Soles) might be tasked with disruptive operations—primarily outside the US (kidnapping, infrastructure sabotage in the region), but with spillover risk via migrant corridors and diaspora communities. (Federal Register)

Implications for US security practitioners

• Homeland:

  • Elevated but still indirect risk of terror plots or retaliatory attacks against soft US targets (diplomatic, cultural, economic) in the hemisphere.

  • Cyber threat level rises significantly due to likely Iranian participation (historical pattern in other crises). (ایران اینترنشنال | Iran International)

• Operational:

  • US facilities in Puerto Rico, Florida, Texas, and Gulf Coast, plus major energy, shipping, and aviation nodes, become priority defensive assets.

  • Private security must assume persistent low-level probing: social-engineering, physical surveillance of key facilities, increased gang violence in some metropolitan hubs.

Scenario C – Limited ground operations / lodgment

You argued, “once troops hit the ground, they will.” The conditions under which this is likely:

• A humanitarian or hostage crisis on the Venezuelan coast or islands.

• The need to secure key infrastructure (e.g., radars, SSM batteries, drone sites) to de-risk flight and sea lanes.

• Collapse of a local garrison or a breakaway movement requesting support.

Military profile

• Limited amphibious lodgments and raids by Marine Expeditionary Units, not a full-scale occupation.

• High reliance on precision fires and ISR to manage risk.

Asymmetric response

• Guerrilla/urban warfare in localized areas; colectivos, militias, and security forces will treat any ground presence as an existential threat.

• Increased likelihood that Iran and Hezbollah perceive this as crossing a strategic red line.

Implications for US security practitioners

• Homeland:

  • Threat level pushes toward “elevated but targeted”: intelligence suggests risk concentrates on symbolic and high-value nodes rather than random mass-casualty attacks.

• Regional:

  • US embassies, consulates, and US-linked corporate facilities in Caracas, Bogotá, Lima, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, and São Paulo merit elevated protective measures.

  • Major energy infrastructure (offshore platforms, refineries, pipelines) in the Caribbean and Gulf take on higher risk for drone, mine, or sabotage attacks.

Scenario D – Protracted regime-change campaign with proxy warfare

This is the less likely but most disruptive path: sustained US efforts—openly or covertly—to remove Maduro, paired with Venezuelan allies committing to keep him in power or exact a price for his removal.

Military profile

• Extended air and maritime campaign, deeper SOF and intelligence footprint, and support to opposition forces.

• Potential fragmentation of Venezuelan state into zones of control (regime, opposition, insurgent, criminal).

Asymmetric response

• Full activation of the IRGC/Hezbollah network in the hemisphere.

• Regional proxy escalation:

  • Increased ELN/FARC activity against US-linked interests in Colombia and along the border. (hrw.org)

  • Cyber and information operations tying together Latin American anti-US narratives and global anti-imperialist messaging.

• Expanded use of criminal FTOs as tools of disruption and smuggling for sanctions evasion.

Implications for US security practitioners

• Multi-year requirement for:

  • Hardened security across critical infrastructure sectors (energy, transportation, finance, government facilities).

  • Enhanced interagency fusion centers and public-private information-sharing focused on cross-domain threats (cyber + physical + financial).

  • Increased attention to diaspora communities, ensuring protection without stigmatization.

---

4. Threats by Domain for US Security Professionals

4.1 Physical security – homeland

• Primary risk vectors:

  • Soft symbolic targets linked to US foreign policy (embassies, consulates abroad, cultural centers, high-profile corporate sites).

  • Critical infrastructure with high visibility and interdependence (energy hubs, ports, major airports, large data centers).

• Actors:

  • Iran/Hezbollah if they decide to escalate beyond the region.

  • Transnational gangs tied to Tren de Aragua or other FTO-designated cartels that may see opportunity for extortion, smuggling, or targeted violence amid chaos. (Federal Register)

For most US facilities, the immediate task is not to assume car bombs tomorrow, but to tighten baseline posture: access control, surveillance, anomaly reporting, and rapid coordination with federal partners.

4.2 Physical security – regional (Latin America & Caribbean)

For US and allied entities operating in the hemisphere:

• High-risk geographies:

  • Colombia–Venezuela border regions (Catatumbo, Arauca, Apure). (hrw.org)

  • Guyanese offshore oil region and coastal areas. (The Washington Post)

  • Major urban centers with significant Venezuelan and Colombian diasporas.

• Threats:

  • Kidnapping, extortion, and targeted killings by ELN/FARC, TdA, and other armed groups.

  • Potential Hezbollah/Iran-linked attacks against Israeli, Jewish, or US targets if escalation crosses key thresholds.

Security professionals with assets in these regions need scenario-based evacuation and shelter-in-place plans, plus robust liaison with host-nation security forces.

4.3 Cyber domain

Iran has a well-documented playbook of retaliatory cyber operations tied to crises (esp. against the US and Gulf states). In a conflict where its drone infrastructure and advisors are at risk, expected behavior includes:

• DDoS and intrusion attempts against:

  • US government portals, financial sector, energy, and industrial control system networks.

• Destructive or pseudo-ransomware attacks aimed at causing visible disruption and signalling capability.

Venezuela’s indigenous cyber capabilities are more limited, but Iranian and possibly Russian support can compensate. (ایران اینترنشنال | Iran International)

For US defenders, this is a classic “elevated posture, assume compromise attempts” environment:

• Heightened monitoring, patching, and incident response readiness.

• Particular focus on identity and access management, given likely use of credential stuffing and social engineering.

4.4 Economic and financial channels

Sanctions and FTO designations will push Caracas and allied networks into harder-to-monitor channels, including:

• Crypto-based laundering, trade-based money laundering, and layered shell companies.

• Increased reliance on gold, oil swaps, and illicit trafficking.

Financial institutions and corporate security teams should anticipate:

• Greater regulatory expectation for enhanced due diligence on Venezuela-linked entities, especially in shipping, commodities, and logistics.

• Potential use of front companies to source dual-use goods for drone and missile programs.

---

5. Key Indicators & Warnings to Track

Security professionals should not try to predict political decisions, but can track observable indicators that suggest movement from one scenario to another:

1. Kinetic thresholds

   • First confirmed US strike on Venezuelan territory (airbase, radar, drone site).

   • First Venezuelan drone/missile engagement against US ships or allied platforms in the region.

2. Proxy activation signals

   • Sudden spike in ELN/FARC activity explicitly framed as anti-US or anti-“imperialist” rather than purely Colombian. (hrw.org)

   • Changes in diaspora rhetoric or intelligence reporting indicating Hezbollah facilitation for operations in Latin America.

3. Iranian posture

   • IRGC/Quds Force media and official rhetoric linking Caribbean operations to the broader Iran–US confrontation. (ایران اینترنشنال | Iran International)

   • Notable uptick in Iran-attributed cyber activity targeting US critical infrastructure.

4. Criminal ecosystem shifts

   • Intelligence or law-enforcement indicators that Tren de Aragua or Cartel de los Soles are being tasked with explicitly political or retaliatory missions. (U.S. Department of the Treasury)

5. Regional alignment

   • Moves by Brazil, Colombia, Guyana, and Cuba (e.g., changes in basing access, emergency declarations, or public security postures) that either constrain or facilitate escalation. (Al Jazeera)

---

6. Practical Takeaways for US Security Professionals

6.1 Don’t underreact, don’t overreact

• This is not yet a global terror emergency, but it is a meaningful shift in the security landscape of the Western hemisphere.

• The most realistic near-term threats are:

  • Regional instability and asymmetric attacks in Latin America and the Caribbean.

  • Cyber and information operations that touch the US homeland.

  • Opportunistic crime and gang violence that exploit the political climate.

6.2 Prioritize sectors and geographies

For US-based practitioners:

• High priority sectors:

  • Government and defense-related facilities.

  • Transportation (ports, major airports, rail hubs).

  • Energy (refineries, LNG terminals, pipelines, grid nodes).

  • Finance and high-value data centers.

For regional operations in the Americas:

• Elevate posture in Colombia, Guyana, Caribbean islands, and major Latin American capitals with significant US corporate presence.

6.3 Tighten coordination channels

• Ensure clear lines of communication between corporate security, local law enforcement, federal agencies (FBI, DHS, DoD), and, in the regional context, host-nation security forces.

• Participate actively in ISACs/ISAOs and sector-specific information-sharing fora, especially for cyber and infrastructure threats.

6.4 Build asymmetric defense thinking into plans

Because Venezuelan and allied actors cannot win a conventional contest, they will look for leverage and asymmetry:

• Think in terms of multi-domain stress tests: what happens if you have a cyber incident, a physical security scare, and a misinformation wave about your organization in the same week?

• Exercise crisis communication, rapid threat triage, and continuity of operations for overlapping incidents.

---

7. Bottom Line

• The US is already in a low-intensity armed campaign around Venezuela’s periphery, justified by narcoterror rhetoric and backed by the most powerful carrier strike group on earth. (AP News)

• Venezuela is not a peer military threat but has meaningful anti-access tools, regional insurgent partners, and powerful external allies (Iran, Russia, Cuba) that specialize in asymmetric response. (Army Recognition)

• Once a US munition lands on Venezuelan soil, the political space for de-escalation narrows dramatically. That’s the point at which regional terrorism risk, cyber attacks, and proxy warfare become much more likely—not as abstract terrorism, but as extensions of state strategy.

For US security professionals, the appropriate stance is:

• Calm, elevated readiness, not panic.

• Focus on systems and posture rather than prediction: access control, cyber hygiene, liaison, scenario planning.

• Track indicators and thresholds so you know when to shift from “watchful” to “active mitigation.”