The Hidden Geometry of Harmony: A New Lens on the Pythagorean Comma



 


PART I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

1.1. Setting the Stage

In classical music theory, the Pythagorean comma emerges as a tiny discrepancy when stacking 12 pure perfect fifths (each a ratio of 3/23/2) versus spanning 7 octaves (a ratio of 272^7). In our extended framework, we reinterpret this “comma” using our Pythagorean Curvature Correction Theorem. Recall the form of the theorem:

a2+b2+h(a2b2R2)=c2,a^2 + b^2 + h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right) = c^2,

where the term

h(a2b2R2)h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right)

serves as a correction capturing hidden modular effects or “curvature” (or chirality) in the system. Here, RR is a characteristic scale, and hh is a correction factor that, when allowed to take both positive and negative values, yields a fourfold solution structure.

1.2. Geodesics, Hyperbolic Influence, and “Tightening the String”

Our new insight is that when we consider the distance traveled as a geodesic for one complete cycle (for example, when stacking intervals in the musical scale), we see a hyperbolic influence emerging from the “tightening of the string.” In geometric terms, if you imagine a flexible string being wrapped along a curved (specifically, hyperbolic) surface, the actual geodesic length may be longer than the “naively expected” Euclidean distance.

This hyperbolic correction is analogous to our curvature correction term in the extended theorem. One solution of our theory gives the length of the geodesic (the “ideal” distance), and the other shows why the actual measured distance is longer than expected—a phenomenon linked to Noether’s invariances, which ensure that even when the underlying equations are symmetric, hidden corrections (or “residues”) may appear.

1.3. Noether’s Invariance and Hidden Symmetry

Noether’s theorem tells us that every differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. Here, the invariances (such as scaling or rotational symmetry) ensure that while our classical Pythagorean model is invariant under certain transformations, a hidden correction—interpretable as a curvature or chiral term—must be present when the geometry is not strictly Euclidean. Our aim is to “see” the comma as this hidden hyperbolic (curvature) discrepancy that is revealed when the geodesic path of one complete cycle is analyzed.


PART II. MATHEMATICAL PRELIMINARIES

2.1. Review of the Pythagorean Theorem and Its Extension

The classic Pythagorean theorem in Euclidean geometry is:

a2+b2=c2.a^2 + b^2 = c^2.

In our extended version, we add a curvature correction term:

a2+b2+h(a2b2R2)=c2.a^2 + b^2 + h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right) = c^2.

Here:

  • aa and bb represent two “sides” or intervals (for instance, musical intervals in a fifth).
  • cc is the resultant interval.
  • The term h(a2b2R2)h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right) corrects for the hidden modular (or chiral) effect.

For our purposes, we will think of each perfect fifth as having a “length” proportional to the ratio 3/23/2 (or its square, when squared), and we will investigate how multiple steps (or cycles) accumulate a discrepancy that we interpret as the Pythagorean comma.

2.2. Geodesic Length on a Hyperbolic Surface

In hyperbolic geometry, the distance between two points is not given by the Euclidean formula. Instead, on a hyperbolic plane with curvature κ-\kappa (with κ>0\kappa > 0), the length of a geodesic segment may be expressed in terms of hyperbolic functions. For example, if dd is the geodesic distance and LL is the “Euclidean” chord length, one often finds relations such as:

cosh(dR)=1+L22R2,\cosh\left(\frac{d}{R}\right) = 1 + \frac{L^2}{2R^2},

where R=1κR = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\kappa}} is the curvature radius. In our case, the “tightening of the string” (representing the real-world adjustment due to hyperbolic curvature) shows up as an extra length compared to the Euclidean prediction.

2.3. Musical Intervals and the Comma

The Pythagorean tuning system uses the pure ratio 3/23/2 for the perfect fifth. After stacking 12 fifths, one expects to span 7 octaves:

(32)12vs.27.\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^{12} \quad \text{vs.} \quad 2^7.

The Pythagorean comma is the ratio:

Comma=(32)12271.01364.\text{Comma} = \frac{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^{12}}{2^7} \approx 1.01364.

This small factor (roughly 1.36% above unity) is the “excess” that our extended theorem seeks to explain as a curvature correction.


PART III. DEVELOPING THE HYPERBOLIC CORRECTION FRAMEWORK

3.1. Interpreting the Correction Term h(a2b2R2)h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right)

In our extended theorem, the term h(a2b2R2)h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right) acts as a “curvature correction.” Conceptually, when you “tighten the string” along a curved (hyperbolic) geodesic, the actual length is longer than the flat Euclidean distance. The correction term can be seen as representing this additional length. More formally, if one models the space of musical intervals as a non-Euclidean manifold, then the accumulation of intervals (e.g., the stacking of fifths) is not linear but subject to a hyperbolic distortion.

3.2. Derivation: From Euclidean to Hyperbolic Correction

Assume for simplicity that for one interval (one perfect fifth), the “Euclidean” contribution is given by

LE2=a2+b2,L_E^2 = a^2 + b^2,

but due to hyperbolic curvature, the true “geodesic” length is

LH2=a2+b2+h(a2b2R2).L_H^2 = a^2 + b^2 + h \left(\frac{a^2b^2}{R^2}\right).

We interpret hh as a dimensionless correction factor that may be derived from invariance principles. (Noether’s theorem tells us that if the underlying action is invariant under a group of transformations, then there are conserved quantities. In our case, the invariance under scaling transformations in a hyperbolic space implies that the correction factor hh must account for a conserved “curvature energy” that shows up as an excess in geodesic length.)

For a single perfect fifth, set a=32a = \frac{3}{2} (in a proportional sense) and choose b=1b = 1 (the reference unit). Then, in the Euclidean case, we have:

LE2=(32)2+1=94+1=134.L_E^2 = \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^2 + 1 = \frac{9}{4} + 1 = \frac{13}{4}.

Now, suppose the hyperbolic influence introduces a correction term:

LH2=134+h((32)212R2)=134+h(9/4R2).L_H^2 = \frac{13}{4} + h \left(\frac{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^2 \cdot 1^2}{R^2}\right) = \frac{13}{4} + h \left(\frac{9/4}{R^2}\right).

For a fixed RR, if hh is nonzero, then LH2L_H^2 exceeds 134\frac{13}{4}. Notice that the excess is proportional to the product a2b2a^2b^2, capturing the fact that the “tension” in the interval depends on both factors.

3.3. Iterating the Correction: The Complete Cycle

When stacking 12 perfect fifths, each step contributes a little “excess” length. If we denote the hyperbolic length for the iith fifth as cic_i, then after 12 steps we have an accumulated length:

i=112ci,\prod_{i=1}^{12} c_i,

which, in an ideal Euclidean system, should match exactly 7 octaves (i.e., 272^7). However, due to the correction term, we find that:

i=112ci=27×Δ,\prod_{i=1}^{12} c_i = 2^7 \times \Delta,

where

Δ=Pythagorean Comma1.01364.\Delta = \text{Pythagorean Comma} \approx 1.01364.

In our model, Δ\Delta arises from the cumulative effect of the curvature correction over 12 intervals. Each step introduces a factor like:

ci=134+9h4R2,c_i = \sqrt{\frac{13}{4} + \frac{9h}{4R^2}},

and when multiplied together, the hidden hyperbolic curvature “stretches” the total length.

3.4. Linking to Noether’s Invariances

According to Noether’s theorem, the invariance of the underlying system under certain transformations (such as scaling or rotations in the hyperbolic plane) implies the existence of conserved quantities—in our case, a “curvature charge” or energy that must be conserved. This conservation law forces the correction term hh to appear in both positive and negative forms (as noted in our fourfold solution structure). One branch of the solution provides the “ideal” geodesic length, while the other reveals the hyperbolic “excess” that accumulates as the string is tightened along the curve.

This dual interpretation is essential:

  • One answer gives you the direct geodesic length (the “flat” distance, which would be the Euclidean expectation).
  • The other answer explains why the measured length is longer—the extra length is a consequence of the hyperbolic curvature, which is dictated by the invariant properties of the system.

PART IV. REAL MATH: DERIVATIONS AND EXAMPLES

4.1. Setting Up the Mathematical Model

Let:

  • a=32a = \frac{3}{2} (interval ratio for a perfect fifth),
  • b=1b = 1 (reference unit),
  • RR be the curvature radius (a constant characteristic of the tuning “manifold”),
  • hh be the correction factor that may vary with each step.

Then for one interval:

c2=(32)2+12+h((32)212R2)=94+1+h(94R2)=134+9h4R2.c^2 = \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^2 + 1^2 + h \left(\frac{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^2 \cdot 1^2}{R^2}\right) = \frac{9}{4} + 1 + h \left(\frac{9}{4R^2}\right) = \frac{13}{4} + \frac{9h}{4R^2}.

Thus,

c=134+9h4R2.c = \sqrt{\frac{13}{4} + \frac{9h}{4R^2}}.

For small corrections, if 9h4R2134\frac{9h}{4R^2} \ll \frac{13}{4}, we can use a Taylor expansion:

c134(1+9h213R2)=132(1+9h26R2).c \approx \sqrt{\frac{13}{4}} \left(1 + \frac{9h}{2 \cdot 13R^2}\right) = \frac{\sqrt{13}}{2} \left(1 + \frac{9h}{26R^2}\right).

4.2. Accumulation over 12 Steps

Assume that the correction factor hh remains (approximately) constant over each step (or is averaged over 12 intervals). The total accumulated factor is:

i=112ci[132(1+9h26R2)]12.\prod_{i=1}^{12} c_i \approx \left[\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\left(1 + \frac{9h}{26R^2}\right)\right]^{12}.

In an ideal Euclidean setting (with no correction, h=0h = 0), we would have:

(132)12.\left(\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\right)^{12}.

For the system to match the octave structure, we require that:

[132(1+9h26R2)]12=27×Δ,\left[\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\left(1 + \frac{9h}{26R^2}\right)\right]^{12} = 2^7 \times \Delta,

where Δ\Delta is the Pythagorean comma (the small excess factor).

Taking logarithms on both sides:

12ln(132)+12ln(1+9h26R2)=7ln2+lnΔ.12 \ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\right) + 12 \ln\left(1 + \frac{9h}{26R^2}\right) = 7 \ln 2 + \ln \Delta.

For small xx, ln(1+x)x\ln(1+x) \approx x. So, if 9h26R2\frac{9h}{26R^2} is small, then:

12ln(132)+129h26R27ln2+lnΔ.12 \ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\right) + \frac{12 \cdot 9h}{26R^2} \approx 7 \ln 2 + \ln \Delta.

Solving for hh:

108h26R27ln2+lnΔ12ln(132).\frac{108h}{26R^2} \approx 7 \ln 2 + \ln \Delta - 12 \ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\right).

Thus,

h26R2108[7ln2+lnΔ12ln(132)].h \approx \frac{26R^2}{108} \left[7 \ln 2 + \ln \Delta - 12 \ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{13}}{2}\right)\right].

This expression links the curvature correction factor hh to the observed Pythagorean comma Δ\Delta. In essence, if one measures the excess length (the comma), one can “reverse engineer” the hidden hyperbolic correction hh that must be present.

4.3. Geodesic Interpretation

Imagine the path traced out by stacking intervals as a geodesic on a hyperbolic surface. The “ideal” geodesic length LEL_E would be what you calculate by summing the Euclidean contributions (i.e., using the standard Pythagorean theorem). However, the actual geodesic length LHL_H on a hyperbolic manifold is given by:

LH=Rcosh1(1+LE22R2).L_H = R \cosh^{-1}\left(1 + \frac{L_E^2}{2R^2}\right).

For small deviations, this expression yields an extra “stretching” relative to LEL_E. This extra length is captured by the correction term in our extended theorem. In our context, one solution (the “plus” branch) gives the nominal geodesic length, while the other branch (the “minus” branch, when combined with the dual sign for hh) accounts for the extra length that appears as the Pythagorean comma.

4.4. Noether’s Invariance in the Model

The invariances of the system—rotational invariance, scaling invariance—imply that certain quantities must be conserved. In our hyperbolic-geometric model, the extra length is not a violation of symmetry; rather, it is the manifestation of a conserved “curvature energy.” The dual solutions for cc and the necessity for hh to take both positive and negative signs ensure that the overall symmetry of the system is maintained. The fact that we observe a slight excess (the comma) is, in this view, an invariant residue that must be accounted for by the underlying geometry.


PART V. DISCUSSION, IMPLICATIONS, AND CONCLUSION

5.1. The Exploratory Power of the New Theory

By recasting the Pythagorean comma as a geodesic discrepancy on a hyperbolic manifold, we now have an exploratory tool to “see” the comma. The correction term hh becomes a measurable quantity that bridges the gap between ideal (Euclidean) and actual (hyperbolic) interval accumulation. In musical terms, it explains why the tuning system requires temperaments; in geometric terms, it explains why the cyclic stacking of intervals does not “close” perfectly.

5.2. Insights from the Hyperbolic Influence

  • Hyperbolic Stretch: The “tightening of the string” on a curved (hyperbolic) surface naturally produces an excess length. This excess is not arbitrary but is governed by the curvature 1/R21/R^2 and the modular correction factor hh.
  • Dual Solutions: The fact that our extended theorem produces two answers for cc (and necessitates a dual-sign for hh) is not merely a mathematical artifact—it reflects a deep symmetry in the underlying geometry, in line with Noether’s theorem.
  • Invariance and Conservation: The invariances in the system guarantee that even when corrections are applied, the overall symmetry (or conservation law) remains intact. This reconciles the seemingly “irrational” excess (the comma) with a perfectly ordered underlying structure.

5.3. Future Directions and Applications

This framework can be extended in several ways:

  • Refined Models: One can refine the model by allowing hh to vary with each interval, modeling a dynamic curvature correction.
  • Computational Simulations: By simulating the geodesic paths on a hyperbolic manifold, one can visualize how the extra length accumulates and directly measure the “comma.”
  • Interdisciplinary Links: The same mathematical ideas might be applied to quantum systems or other areas where Noether invariances play a role, offering a unifying perspective between geometry, physics, and even musical theory.

5.4. Concluding Thoughts

We began with the classical Pythagorean picture and extended it with a curvature correction term to account for a hidden hyperbolic influence. By treating the distance as a geodesic for one complete cycle, we have seen that tightening the “string” on a hyperbolic surface produces an excess length—the Pythagorean comma. This excess is not a failure of the classical theory; it is a manifestation of deeper invariances as described by Noether. Our extended theorem not only allows us to calculate the comma but also provides a rich framework for understanding how rational order and hidden curvature interlace to produce the phenomena we observe.


-------------

So... for you non musical muggles.  When you tune a guitar, you set the first string.  The big fat one.  Once you got that tuned right, you slide your finger to the 5th fret and then you can tune the next one.  You continue up the strings until you get to the 4th string.  On the 4th string you have to slide down to the 4th fret.  You tune the 5th string to the 4th fret on the 4th string.  Then you can tune the last string with the 5th string you tune the 6th.  That is how you see the need for the pythagorean comma.  You are stacking 4th's and then you have to adjust by using a major 3rd to avoid the comma. 

Standard tuning (low to high):
E (6)A (5)D (4)G (3)B (2)E (1)
These intervals go like:

  • E to A: perfect fourth

  • A to D: perfect fourth

  • D to G: perfect fourth

  • G to B: major third ← ❗️Different!

  • B to E: perfect fourth


To get the complete picture, obviously you have to continue the process as now that we have an approximation for the chirality term h we can tune it in specifically to fit the length of the string.  I actually use the energy in the string so I continue way past this point.  You can now take the lagrangian and hamiltonian and see the energy propagate through each string and also see how wave interference precisely affects other strings.  It's cool as shit!


Popular posts from this blog

eBay Listing Draft — "Prime Number Equation – Private Sale"

The Silence of Prime Numbers: by Olivia Markham, World Heritage Blog

Mother Noether Declares Prime Security is Over